Bay Health

Last modified

Bay Fish and Shellfish

Habitats and Lower Food Web

Water Quality

Metadata 

Chesapeake Bay Program Indicator Framework

Indicator and Data Survey

A.  Category/Name/Source/Contact

(1) Category of Indicator

___ Factors Impacting Bay and Watershed Health

___ Restoration and Protection Efforts

___ Watershed Health

_x__ Bay Health

 

(2) Name of Indicator: Bay Health Overarching Index

(3) Description of Dataset used to calculate percent of goal achieved:  

•The Bay Health Overarching Index incorporates scores for the following top level indices: 

•Water Quality Top Level Index 

•Habitats and Lower Food Web Top Level Index

•Fish and Shellfish Top Level Index 

Percent achievement values for each Top Level Index were averaged to create the overarching index score.

•The Water Quality Top Level Index incorporates scores for the following indicators:

Dissolved Oxygen Standards Attainment

Mid-Channel Water Clarity

Chlorophyll a

Chemical Contaminants

Percent achievement values for each indicator assessed in the Water Quality Index category were averaged to calculate the top level index score.

•The Habitats and Lower Food Web Top Level Index incorporates scores for the following indicators:

Underwater Bay Grass Abundance

Phytoplankton (Index of Biotic Integrity)

Bottom Habitat (Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity)

Percent achievement values for each indicator assessed in the Habitats and Lower Food Web category were averaged to calculate the top level index score.

•The Fish and Shellfish Abundance Top Level Index incorporates scores for the following indicators:

Blue Crab Abundance

Striped Bass Abundance

Native Oyster Abundance

Shad Abundance

Percent achievement values for each indicator assessed in the Fish and Shellfish Abundance category were averaged to create the index score.

For what purpose(s) were the data collected? (e.g., tracking, research, or long-term monitoring.) Tracking progress towards a goal and long-term monitoring.

Which parameters were measured directly? Percent goal achievement values for the component indicators are based on directly measured, monitored information. Which were obtained by calculation?  Percent achievement values for each top level index assessed in the category were averaged to create the overarching index score.  Each top level index was assigned equal weight.

(4) Source(s) of Data: Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators.

Dissolved Oxygen Standards Attainment: www.chesapeakebay.net/status_dissolvedoxygen.aspx 

Mid-Channel Water Clarity: www.chesapeakebay.net/status_clarity.aspx 

Chlorophyll a: www.chesapeakebay.net/status_chlorophyla.aspx 

Chemical Contaminants: www.chesapeakebay.net/status_chemicalcontaminants.aspx 

Underwater Bay Grass Abundance: www.chesapeakebay.net/status_baygrasses.aspx

Bottom Habitat (Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity):  www.chesapeakebay.net/status_phytoplankton.aspx

Phytoplankton (Index of Biotic Integrity): www.chesapeakebay.net/status_bottomhabitat.aspx

Blue Crab Abundance: www.chesapeakebay.net/status_bluecrab.aspx 

Striped Bass Abundance: www.chesapeakebay.net/status_stripedbass.aspx 

Native Oyster Abundance: www.chesapeakebay.net/status_oyster.aspx

Shad Abundance: www.chesapeakebay.net/status_shad.aspx

Is the complete data set accessible, including metadata, data-dictionaries and embedded definitions?  If yes, please indicate where complete dataset can be obtained.   Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators.

(5) Custodian of Source Data (and Indicator, if different): Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators (urls listed in item 4, above).

(6) CBPO Contact:Nita Sylvester (sylvester.nita@epa.gov)

B.  Communication Questions

(complete either part 1, 2, or 3)

1.  Restoration and Protection Efforts indicators only

(7a) How much has been completed since 1985 (or baseline year)?  How much has been completed since 2000?

(8a) How much was done last year?

(9a) What is the current status in relation to a goal?

(10a) What is the key story told by this indicator?

(11a) Why is it important to report this information?

(12a) What detail and/or diagnostic indicators are related to this reporting level indicator? (Detail and diagnostic indicators can be spatially-specific, parameter-specific, temporally-specific information, etc.)

2.  Bay Health or Watershed Health indicators only

(7b) What is the long-term trend?  (Since start of data collection)  N/A – data for all component indices has only been collected for four years.

(8b) What is the short-term trend? (10-year trend)  N/A – data for all component indices has only been collected for four years (2006: 37.1%; 2007: 38.6%; 2008: 38.8%; 2009: 45.1)

(9b) What is the current status in relation to a goal?  The Bay’s health is measured with 13 indicators grouped in three areas that represent major components of the Bay ecosystem: Water Quality, Habitats & Lower Food Web and Fish & Shellfish.  Quantitative restoration goals have been set for most of these indicators. When all of the goals for these areas are reached, it should mean a restored Bay. The current status is 45.1%.

(10b) What does this indicator tell us?  Despite a six percent improvement in overall health since 2008, the Bay continues to have poor water quality, degraded habitats and low populations of many species of fish and shellfish. Based on these three areas, the overall health averaged 45 percent, with 100 percent representing a fully restored ecosystem.

(11b) Why is it important to report this information?  The Chesapeake Bay is one of the most extraordinary places in America. The unique estuary and its vast watershed have tremendous ecological, historic, cultural, economic and recreational value to the region and the entire country.

(12b) What detail and/or diagnostic indicators are related to this index? 

•Water Quality Top Level Index 

•Habitats and Lower Food Web Top Level Index

•Fish and Shellfish Top Level Index 

3.  Factors Impacting Bay and Watershed Health indicators only

(7c) What is the long-term trend?  (since start of data collection) 

(8c) What is the short-term trend? (3 to 5 year trend)

(9c) What is the current status?

(10c) What is the key story told by this indicator?

(11c) Why is it important to report this information?

(12c) What detail and/or diagnostic indicators are related to this reporting level indicator?

C.  Temporal Considerations

(13) Data Collection Date(s):  Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators

(14) Planned Update Frequency (e.g. - annual, bi-annual): Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators

(a) Source Data:

(b) Indicator:

(15) For annual reporting, month data is available for reporting: Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators

D.  Spatial Considerations

(16) Type of Geography of Source Data (point, line polygon, other): Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators

(17) Acceptable Level of Spatial Aggregation (e.g. - county, state, major basin, tributary basin, HUC): Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators

(18) Are there geographic areas with missing data?  If so, where? Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators

(19) The spatial extent of this indicator best described as:

(a) Chesapeake Bay (estuary)

(b) Chesapeake Bay Watershed

(c) Other (please describe): _______________________

Please submit any appropriate examples of how this information has been mapped or otherwise portrayed geographically in the past.

(20) Can appropriate diagnostic indicators be represented geographically? Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators.

E.  Data Analysis and Interpretation

(Please provide appropriate references and location of documentation if hard to find.)

(21) Is the conceptual model used to transform these measurements into an indicator widely accepted as a scientifically sound representation of the phenomenon it indicates?  (i.e., how well do the data represent the phenomenon?) Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators

(22) What is the process by which the raw data is summarized for development and presentation of the indicator?   Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators

 

(23) Are any tools required to generate the indicator data (e.g. - Interpolator, watershed model) Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators

(24) Are the computations widely accepted as a scientifically sound? Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators

(25) Have appropriate statistical methods been used to generalize or portray data beyond the time or spatial locations where measurements were made (e.g., statistical survey inference, no generalization is possible)?  Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators

(26) Are there established reference points, thresholds or ranges of values for this indicator that unambiguously reflect the desired state of the environment? (health/stressors only) Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators 

F.  Data Quality

(Please provide appropriate references and location of documentation if hard to find.)

(27) Were the data collected according to an EPA-approved Quality Assurance Plan?  

If no, complete questions 28a – 28d:  Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators

(28a) Are the sampling design, monitoring plan and/or tracking system used to collect the data over time and space based on sound scientific principles? 

(28b) What documentation clearly and completely describes the underlying sampling and analytical procedures used?  

(28c) Are the sampling and analytical procedures widely accepted as scientifically and technically valid?

(28d) To what extent are the procedures for quality assurance and quality control of the data documented and accessible? 

(29) Are the descriptions of the study or survey design clear, complete and sufficient to enable the study or survey to be reproduced? 

(30) Were the sampling and analysis methods performed consistently throughout the data record? 

(31) If datasets from two or more agencies are merged, are their sampling designs and methods comparable? 

(32) Are uncertainty measurements or estimates available for the indicator and/or the underlying data set?  

(33) (Do the uncertainty and variability impact the conclusions that can be inferred from the data and the utility of the indicator?  

(34) Are there noteworthy limitations or gaps in the data record?  Please explain. 

G.  Additional Information

(optional)

(35) Please provide any other information about this indicator you believe is necessary to aid communication and any prevent potential miss-representation.

Refer to the data and methods for the component indicators

Page statistics
613 view(s) and 3 edit(s)
Social share
Share this page?

Tags

This page has no custom tags.
This page has no classifications.

Comments

You must to post a comment.

Attachments